Flat 30% off for Singapore 🇸🇬
Book a 30-min call →
14 days · $1,999 · fixed

Ship It Live · website sprint

A complete custom website, live in 14 days.

Custom-coded, not a theme with your logo dropped in. Designed, built, deployed and fast — in two weeks, for a number agreed before anything starts.

Enter to send
4.93★ / 32 reviews 75+ shipped Kickoff in 24h

Quick answer

A complete custom multi-page website can be designed, built and deployed in 14 days for a fixed $1,999. That covers design, build, responsive testing, SEO fundamentals and going live on your domain, with revisions included and the source code handed over.

The plan

Day one to day 14, written down.

You get this schedule before you commit, not after. If a phase slips, that is mine to absorb — the price and the date were agreed before anything started.

The scheduleDay 1 → day 14
01Brief and structureDays 1–2
02DesignDays 3–7
03BuildDays 8–12
04LaunchDays 13–14
  1. 1

    Days 1–2

    Brief and structure

    What the site has to prove, to whom, and in what order. Sitemap and page structure agreed before any visual work.

  2. 2

    Days 3–7

    Design

    Every page designed and reviewed. You see the homepage within about three days, so direction gets settled early.

  3. 3

    Days 8–12

    Build

    Custom-coded, responsive, fast. A staging URL goes up early so you review the real thing rather than a picture of it.

  4. 4

    Days 13–14

    Launch

    Performance and SEO checks, domain connected, analytics on, and live.

What $1,999 gets you

Everything needed to launch — nothing padding the invoice.

Custom design — no templates, no theme with your colours
Every page designed, not just the homepage
Custom-coded and genuinely fast on a phone
SEO fundamentals: structure, meta, schema, sitemap
A CMS if you need to edit it yourself
Live on your domain with analytics connected
Source code and design files yours at handover
30 days of post-launch support, included

Who books this

Built for

Businesses whose current site is embarrassing them in sales calls

Founders who need a real site before a launch or a raise

Anyone quoted three months and five figures for a marketing site

Real situations

Five ways this shows up, and what actually fixes it.

Not hypothetical — the shape of the problem before someone books this sprint, and the specific part of the build that resolves it.

Situation 1

The current site is a liability on sales calls

A founder has started apologizing for their own website before sharing the link on a call, because it visibly undersells a business that has otherwise matured past it.

A complete custom-coded, multi-page site — not a theme with a logo swapped in — replaces it in 14 days for a fixed $1,999.

Situation 2

A raise or launch is close and there's nothing credible to point to

A startup has a funding conversation or a public launch on the calendar within weeks, and the current site would actively work against the pitch if anyone actually visited it.

The homepage is visible within about three days, so direction is settled early enough to be genuinely ready before the deadline.

Situation 3

Quoted three months and five figures for a marketing site

An agency proposal for what amounts to a multi-page marketing site came back at three months and a five-figure number, for scope that doesn't require either.

The same scope — custom design, every page, SEO fundamentals — ships in 14 days for a fixed $1,999, agreed before anything starts.

Situation 4

Content and images exist, but nobody has assembled them

A business has brand assets, copy drafts and product photography sitting in a shared drive, but no one has had the time to turn them into an actual site.

With content ready on day one, the fortnight goes entirely into structure, design and build — the sprint is built around content being the bottleneck.

Situation 5

Wants to edit it without filing a developer ticket

A previous site required a developer for every copy change, and the business has been avoiding small updates because the process to make them is disproportionately slow.

A CMS is included when it makes sense, so the team can edit content themselves after handover, with source code owned outright.

The honest part

When 14 days is the wrong answer.

A fixed deadline only works when the scope genuinely fits inside it. These are the cases where I will tell you so rather than take the booking.

E-commerce with large catalogues and complex fulfilment — a different project with a different number.

Sites needing content written from scratch across dozens of pages. I can structure it, but someone has to write it.

Multi-language builds, which are worth doing properly rather than fitting into a fortnight.

Scope$1,999 · 14 days

Inside the 14 days

  • Custom designno templates, no theme with your colours
  • Every page designed, not just the homepage
  • Custom-coded and genuinely fast on a phone
  • SEO fundamentals: structure, meta, schema, sitemap
  • A CMS if you need to edit it yourself
  • Live on your domain with analytics connected
  • Source code and design files yours at handover
  • 30 days of post-launch support, included

Quoted as one number before day one. A week running long is mine to absorb.

Outside the line

  • E-commerce with large catalogues and complex fulfilmenta different project with a different number.
  • Sites needing content written from scratch across dozens of pages. I can structure it, but someone has to write it.
  • Multi-language builds, which are worth doing properly rather than fitting into a fortnight.

Real work, sized and priced separately. You hear it before you book, not at handover.

Questions

Before you book

Yes, when content and brand assets are ready on day one. The delay on most website projects is not the building — it is waiting for copy, images and decisions. The sprint is structured to surface those on day one rather than day ten.

The page cut-list (what v1 actually ships)

A 14-day website sprint is information architecture + design + build + deploy on your domain — custom-coded multi-page, not a theme with your logo dropped in.

Decide the cut before polish week

Must-have for v1Nice-to-haveLater (after live)
Homepage + primary CTAExtra case-study pagesBlog / long CMS library
About / proof that matches the offerSecondary landing variantsHeavy animation sets
Contact / booking path that worksExtra locale pagesFull design-system docs
Legal pages you actually needMicro-interactions“One more section” forever

Kill criteria for “just one more section”: if it is not on the must-have list by content-lock day, it waits until after go-live. Adding pages mid-sprint is how 14 days becomes “almost ready.”

Sibling: a smaller portfolio site in 5 days ($700) is a different slug — /shipitlive/portfolio-website-in-5-days — not this multi-page marketing site. If you only need a thin portfolio, say so on the call and we point you there.

Content that blocks the clock

The live page already treats content readiness as the bottleneck. This section makes ownership checkable — it does not invent SEO rankings or conversion lifts.

Who owns what

AssetWho suppliesWhy it matters
Copy (or approved drafts)You (or named writer)Build cannot invent your voice
Logos / brand marksYouWrong assets = redo
Photos / product shotsYouStock-only is a last resort, not a plan
Domain / DNS accessYouLive means your domain
Form / booking destinationYouContact that goes nowhere is not live

Soft planning markers (not an SLA)

  • Content lock before polish week — structure and design move faster when copy is not still “TBD.”
  • No lorem on launch — empty states get real placeholders or cut pages, not fake paragraphs.
  • Homepage direction early is already how the sprint is sold on the live page; this insert does not turn that into a new guarantee.

If content arrives late, the calendar slips. That is planning honesty, not a threat.

Live bar for a marketing site

“Live” here means more than a staging URL with a pretty homepage.

Done-when checklist (process)

  • Custom domain pointed
  • HTTPS working
  • Contact / booking / forms actually deliver somewhere you control
  • Analytics hook if scoped on the call
  • Staging reviewed → production cutover owned

Staging cosplay ≠ live. A passworded preview is useful; it is not the finish line.

CMS for self-edits is included when it makes sense for the site — scoped on the call, not smuggled as “every page is a full blog platform in the same 14 days.”

Extra questions

Existing FAQ already covers 14-day feasibility, the fixed $1,999, templates vs custom, CMS edits, what you need on day one, and adding pages later.

Blog / full CMS library in the same 14 days?

Usually scoped separately. A sensible edit path for pages can ship when it fits; a large content system is a different cut.

Who owns domain / DNS / hosting accounts?

You do, by default. Handoff bias: accounts and source in your name so you are not stuck filing tickets for every copy change.

Framer / Webflow vs custom code?

This page is custom-coded multi-page for this sprint. Stack swaps are a call decision.

Portfolio site vs this page?

This page: custom multi-page marketing site · $1,999 · 14 days. Portfolio site in 5 days ($700): thinner portfolio scope — /shipitlive/portfolio-website-in-5-days. Ask if you are unsure which fits.

Is day 14 a guarantee of rankings or lead volume?

No. Day 14 means the agreed pages, design, build, and live bar (domain + HTTPS + working forms) are done. Rankings and conversion depend on market, offer, and content quality over time — we do not invent lifts here. Day counts are planning, not an SLA on SEO.

14 days from now, this could be live.

A 30-minute call decides whether the scope fits. If it doesn't, I'll tell you what would.